‘Bat Out of Hell Trademark Lawsuit’ Filed in Los Angeles
Meat Loaf filed the Bat Out of Hell trademark lawsuit in federal District Court in Los Angeles on May 28, 2006.
He named songwriter Jim Steinman and manager David Sonenberg as defendants.
He seeks a declaration of ownership, an injunction, and more than $50 million in damages.
Core of The Case: Use Vs. Registration
The complaint says Steinman registered “Bat Out of Hell” as a trademark in 1995.
Meat Loaf asserts decades of use on recordings, tours, videos, and merchandise.
Trademark rights flow from use in commerce, with registration adding protection.
Meat Loaf resolves Bat Out of Hell trademark dispute
How The Dispute Emerged
Meat Loaf, born Michael Aday, recorded and performed the signature song.
He says he contributed lyrics to the track.
The filing says Steinman did not challenge the ongoing use until a recent falling-out.
Albums That Built The Brand
Steinman wrote the title track and other songs on the 1977 “Bat Out of Hell” album.
He also composed for 1993’s “Bat Out of Hell II: Back Into Hell.”
According to the complaint, the two albums together sold more than 50 million copies worldwide.
Producer Talks for Album Three Collapsed
Meat Loaf’s team invited Steinman to participate in “Bat Out of Hell III: The Monster Is Loose,” slated for October.
Executive producer Winston Simone said a producer deal awaited Steinman’s signature.
“Along with Jim’s lawyer, we had negotiated by far the best producer agreement that we had ever seen. Unfortunately, Jim decided not to sign the agreement or accept the very substantial advance.”
Alleged Interference With Labels
The complaint says Steinman and Sonenberg contacted Universal and Virgin.
Meat Loaf’s side says they asserted ownership and threatened litigation.
The filing alleges a campaign that undermined plans for the album launch, touring, and business contracts.
Legal Relief Sought
The suit asks the court to declare who owns the mark.
It seeks an injunction stopping further use by Steinman and his company.
It also requests damages exceeding $50 million for interference with contractual relationships.
Why Los Angeles Matters
The case sits in federal District Court in Los Angeles, close to the labels and the industry.
A quick ruling could affect tour schedules, marketing, and inventory.
Control of the mark would shape how labels and promoters deploy the brand.
Bottom Line
The filing asks the judge to settle ownership and stop alleged interference.
It seeks to secure the brand ahead of album and tour plans.
At stake is control of a title that still drives demand—and the outcome of the Bat Out of Hell trademark lawsuit.
